Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41768120›Full record

ArticleRadiology advances2026

Deep learning-based pulmonary nodule risk assessment outperforms established malignancy risk scores in lung cancer screening.

Eduardo J Mortani Barbosa, Yohan Kim, Yanbo Zhang, Arnaud A A Setio, Francois Mellot, Philippe A Grenier, Mathis Zimmermann, Bogdan Georgescu, Sasa Grbic, Warren B Gefter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Eduardo J Mortani BarbosaDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5726-1138
Yohan KimDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7579-3433
Yanbo ZhangDepartment of Digital Technology and Innovation, Siemens Healthineers, Princeton, NJ 08540, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7627-488X
Arnaud A A SetioDepartment of Digital Technology and Innovation, Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Erlangen 91052, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5447-4434
Francois MellotDepartment of Radiology, Foch Hospital, Suresnes 92150, France.
Philippe A GrenierDepartment of Radiology, Foch Hospital, Suresnes 92150, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3745-0032
Mathis ZimmermannDepartment of D&A, Siemens Healthineers, Malvern, PA 19355, United States.
Bogdan GeorgescuDepartment of Digital Technology and Innovation, Siemens Healthineers, Princeton, NJ 08540, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5388-5699
Sasa GrbicDepartment of Digital Technology and Innovation, Siemens Healthineers, Princeton, NJ 08540, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7564-9811
Warren B GefterDepartment of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary nodules are commonly encountered in lung cancer screening. The risk of malignancy varies widely and is generally estimated using expert consensus guidelines (Lung CT Imaging Reporting and Data Systems [Lung-RADS]). Purpose: To assess the performance of a deep learning algorithm (Deep Pulmonary Nodule Profiler [DeepPNP]) for pulmonary nodule malignancy risk estimation in a lung cancer screening dataset and the effect of data enrichment in model training. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using 3 datasets. DeepPNP is a 3D convolutional network (EfficientNet-B0-based) operating on nodule-centered 3D patches. For the DeepPNP model training and validation, the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) dataset was combined with 2 independent malignant nodule-only datasets, resulting in a merged dataset of 28 057 nodules, including 2362 malignant nodules. An ablation model (DeepPNP-NLST) was trained on NLST only. The testing was conducted on a held-out dataset from the NLST dataset. Performance metrics, including sensitivity, specificity, precision, F1 score, and accuracy, were analyzed across 3 operating thresholds selected based on specificities of 0.80, 0.85, and 0.90 (selected on the validation set). Benchmarks included Lung-RADS v2022 and the PanCan model. Results: On the NLST test set (including 2597 nodules from 1243 CT scans), DeepPNP achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC AUC) of 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.95-0.97), outperforming Lung-RADS AUC = 0.91 (95% CI, 0.89-0.94; Conclusion: DeepPNP outperformed established malignancy risk models in lung cancer screening. The inclusion of biopsy-confirmed malignant nodules from 2 external datasets provided a measurable performance gain, underscoring the importance of data enrichment during model training.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceCTdeep learninglung cancer screeningmalignancy classificationpulmonary nodule

Identifiers

PMID41768120
PMCPMC12944827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.