ArticleFrontiers in dementia2026
Expectations for a co-designed virtual immersive program for older adults with dementia in long-term care: a qualitative study with residents, family, and staff.
Article in Frontiers in dementia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Virtual immersive programs (VIP) have been found as a recreational medium with positive impacts on the quality of life for older adults living with dementia in long-term care (LTC). While studies have explored the adoption of a VIP in LTC and suggested the need for tailored programs, there is a paucity of studies that have investigated the expectations of end-users of VIP in LTC. As part of a larger study to co-develop a VIP in LTC settings guided by the design thinking framework, this paper reports the purpose of our study, focused on the first two stages of that framework (i.e., empathy and define), which was to explore expectations prior to implementation of VIP from the perspectives of residents, family members, and staff in Canadian LTC home settings. Methods: We conducted qualitative interviews and focus groups at one LTC home with 14 residents, six family members, and six staff members. We used reflexive thematic analysis to identify key expectations regarding content and delivery, positive outcomes, and concerns of a VIP in LTC. Results: We identified five themes (1) Personalized and engaging content, (2) A world without boundaries, (3) Shared experiences and care support, (4) Challenges of transitioning back to actual reality, and (5) Technology and usability barriers. Conclusion: Our findings offer useful insights and practical tips through the recommendations IMAGINE in co-designing technology that is appropriately tailored to residents, staff, and family members in LTC. This study provides foundational knowledge for the co-design of VIPs by highlighting end-user expectations prior to implementation, an often-overlooked stage in technology development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.