ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
Divergent physiological strategies distinguish tolerant and plastic genotypes in elite Australian rice lines under limited irrigation.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Water scarcity threatens global rice production, necessitating identification of genotypes with improved water use efficiency (WUE) whilst maintaining productivity. Previous drought studies typically imposed severe stress conditions that compromised yield and quality, creating a knowledge gap regarding rice responses to moderate water limitation during vegetative growth. Here we show that 18 temperate japonica and 2 indica rice genotypes employ two distinct water conservation strategies under controlled limited water conditions (60-65% field capacity): inherent physiological tolerance versus adaptive phenotypic plasticity. Methods: We evaluated rice varieties under ponded and limited water treatments, integrating stomatal traits, chlorophyll fluorescence parameters, leaf carbon isotope composition (δ Results: Inherently tolerant genotypes maintained stable photosynthetic performance through constitutively lower stomatal conductance and enhanced cuticular wax deposition. Conversely, adaptive genotypes exhibited pronounced physiological plasticity under water limitation. Notably, LW treatment induced significant enlargement of leaf surface papillae positioned over stomatal complexes, suggesting a potential structural mechanism contributing to reduced transpirational water loss. This represents a previously under-recognised adaptation in smooth-leaf Australian germplasm lacking protective trichomes. Mixed-effects modelling confirmed that photochemical traits and water-use traits responded most strongly to treatment, while reproductive and yield-related measurements indicated no major penalty under limited water. Carbon isotope discrimination (δ Discussion/conclusion: These complementary strategies provide multiple pathways for breeding water-efficient rice adapted to Australian temperate production systems under moderate water limitation without substantial yield loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.