ArticleSurgery in practice and science2026
Artificial intelligence for surgical care in war-torn sudan: Feasibility, barriers, and ethical perspectives from a conflict zone.
Article in Surgery in practice and science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) offers transformative potential for clinical care, yet its deployment in conflict-affected, low-resource settings remains under-researched. This study evaluates AI awareness, barriers, and readiness among Sudanese surgeons amidst the nation's ongoing armed conflict. Methods: A sequential explanatory mixed-methods design was employed. An online survey, adapted from validated instruments, assessed AI familiarity, perceived barriers, ethical concerns, and readiness among Sudanese general surgery residents and specialists. From October 2024 to June 2025, 185 completed responses were obtained from a stratified random sample of 195 eligible participants. Follow-up semi-structured interviews were conducted with 20 selected specialists. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and the Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn's post-hoc comparisons. Qualitative interviews were conducted until thematic saturation was achieved and analyzed thematically, with coding verified through inter-coder reliability. Results: While AI awareness was moderate (68.7%), practical clinical exposure (9.4%) and advanced literacy (10.3%) were notably low. Surgeons identified AI's primary utility in training (68.2%) and perioperative decision-making (65.4%). Significant barriers included infrastructure deficits (87.6%), training gaps (79.1%), and financial constraints (72.4%). Conflict-specific challenges were acute, with 92.5% reporting severe technology shortages and 78.3% citing unreliable power/internet. Qualitative themes highlighted AI's potential for triage and resource allocation, though concerns regarding accountability and ethical governance persisted. Conclusion: This study provides inaugural evidence on AI feasibility within an African zone. Despite infrastructure collapse, Sudanese surgeons show strong interest in AI for triage and diagnostics. To move forward, development must prioritize offline-compatible, context-adapted tools and robust governance frameworks. These findings provide a blueprint for integrating AI to bolster surgical resilience during humanitarian crises.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.