ArticleCase reports in dentistry2026
Integration of Facial Scanning Technology for Full-Arch Implant Rehabilitation and Fabrication of Magnet-Based Surgical Guide and Provisional Prosthesis: A Case Report.
Article in Case reports in dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and Objectives: Digital dentistry applications have been widely used in different aspects of prosthodontics. Multiple studies in the literature report the application of different technologies. The aim of this study was to focus on the combination of facial scanning, intraoral scanning, and cone-beam radiographs for optimal implant planning and prosthodontic rehabilitation. Methods: Complex prosthodontic treatment of maxillary and mandibular implant rehabilitation utilizing the application of a novel technique of digital technology was explored. In this case report, facial scan, intraoral scan (IOS), and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were merged for the virtual planning of implant placement. Results: A stackable magnet-based surgical guide was fabricated and utilized for implant placement. Furthermore, a provisional implant-supported prosthesis was prefabricated for immediate loading and chairside pickup. Conclusion: As the field continues to evolve, new technological advances offer more precise, predictable, and efficient implant rehabilitation. Clinical Significance: This technique is poised to become a component in the practice of advanced prosthodontics, adding to the landscape of dental implantology with its precision, predictability, and patient-centered focus.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.