ArticleInternational journal of dentistry2026
Modified Provisional Technique: A New Prosthetic Approach for Stable Gingival Displacement to Make Impression.
Article in International journal of dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Modified Provisional Technique: A New Prosthetic Approach for Stable Gingival Displacement to Make Impression.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Making impressions of abutments prepared using the subgingival vertical preparation technique in full-mouth rehabilitation cases is challenging, both in terms of bleeding control and effectiveness of gingival displacement. Although gingival retraction techniques include the use of gingival cords and astringents, which represent the current gold standard, they do not guarantee the opening of the gingival sulcus to ensure an uninterrupted reading stream of all the arch elements. In fact, once the retraction cord is removed, the gingival sulcus tends to revert to its original position after the initial 60 s, thereby preventing the detection of the subgingival preparation of most elements in the full arch by the scanner. Thus, to ensure precise recording of the subgingival preparation of all the arch elements, various scanning software techniques, such as cutting and stitching the areas of the distorted impression, have been devised. The prosthetic technique described in this article uses modified provisional restoration in its margins, thereby allowing impression making of individual teeth or the full arch. Upon removal of the provisional restoration, gingival displacement exposes the subpreparation zone, with pink and nonbleeding gingiva, which maintains its stability beyond 5 min. This technique allows immediate recording of the full arch, thereby reducing the scan time in the absence of the use of cords and anesthesia, interference at the apical one-third, interruptions, mesh hole creation, and overlapping seam. Thus, this technique improves overall patient compliance and the chairside time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.