ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Sustained posterior negativity (SPN) elicited by brief (20 ms) symmetrical stimuli.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Mirror symmetry is detected rapidly, yet it remains unresolved whether its canonical neural signature-the Sustained Posterior Negativity (SPN)-requires extended viewing. We therefore asked whether symmetry-selective activity can be generated under highly constrained temporal conditions that limit both prolonged processing and premotor preparation. Methods: We presented centrally displayed, irregular octagons (symmetric or asymmetric) for 20 ms while preventing premotor preparation via a delayed, trial-wise randomized response mapping. EEG was recorded with a 64-channel montage and preprocessed using a fully scripted, automated pipeline; ERPs were computed from correct trials only. Symmetry-related activity was first assessed with a mass-univariate, cluster-based permutation analysis, and then quantified in a confirmatory analysis within a canonical posterior region of interest. A fixed-cohort trial-subsampling analysis was used to examine how per-condition epoch count affects SPN estimation. Results: The cluster-based permutation analysis revealed a mid-latency posterior negativity with the occipito-parietal topography characteristic of the SPN, and the canonical posterior region-of-interest analysis converged on the same effect. Behaviorally, participants discriminated symmetry reliably with a modest liberal bias. Fixed-cohort trial subsampling showed that increasing per-condition epochs enhanced statistical detectability without altering amplitude, indicating precision gains rather than changes in the underlying response. No reliable condition differences were observed in earlier sensory components, and there was no compelling hemispheric lateralization. Discussion: These results demonstrate that brief visual evidence is sufficient to initiate symmetry-selective activity that unfolds over the established SPN time course in the absence of sustained viewing or response preparation. This pattern supports a hybrid account in which a rapid feedforward sweep flags global regularity while recurrent interactions sustain and consolidate the representation, thereby tightening temporal constraints on the neural mechanisms that extract structural order from transient input.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.