ArticleJournal of inflammation research2026
A Novel Composite Bioscore Integrating Biomarkers, Clinical Scores, and Comorbidity Indices for Prognostic Stratification in Sepsis.
Article in Journal of inflammation research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Performance of BIO-S and BIO-SC Composite Bioscores for 28-Day Mortality Stratification in Adults with Sepsis and Septic Shock.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- SOFA-2 score predicts mortality in pneumonia-associated sepsis: a retrospective cohort study.Critical care (London, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Risk stratification in sepsis remains a major clinical challenge in hospital settings, where timely recognition of disease progression can critically influence outcomes. Traditional scoring systems, such as SOFA and APACHE II, are frequently applied but are limited by their complexity and inconsistent predictive accuracy. Integrating biological markers with clinical scores may enhance the early identification of patients with an unfavorable prognosis. Objective: The objective of this investigation was to determine the prognostic performance of two composite scoring systems, BIO-S and BIO-SC, in predicting 28-day mortality among patients with sepsis or septic shock. Methods: We conducted a retrospective single-center study including 125 adult surgical patients with sepsis or septic shock. BIO-S was calculated using procalcitonin (PCT), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), INR, and SOFA score, whereas BIO-SC extended this model by incorporating the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Both bioscores were calculated at admission and analyzed in relation to 28-day mortality and discharge status. Results: Among the 125 patients included, 28-day all-cause mortality was 36% (n = 45). The BIO-SC score achieved the highest predictive accuracy for 28-day mortality (AUC = 0.942), surpassing BIO-S (AUC = 0.930), SOFA (AUC = 0.928), and APACHE II (AUC = 0.918). Both bioscores correlated strongly with discharge outcomes and were independent predictors of 28-day mortality (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Integrating inflammatory biomarkers, organ dysfunction, and comorbidity burden into composite prognostic models such as BIO-S and BIO-SC significantly improves early mortality risk assessment and outcome prediction in sepsis, although external validation remains necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.