ArticleOsteoarthritis and cartilage open2026
Exploratory analysis of the 2-year changes in knee cartilage thickness and transverse relaxation time (T2) in ACL-injured versus healthy participants.
Article in Osteoarthritis and cartilage open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the 2-year changes in cartilage thickness and transverse relaxation time (T2) in magnetic resonance images (MRI) of ACL-injured (ACL_in) and uninjured contralateral knees (ACL_unin), compared to healthy controls (HEA). Method: Baseline and 2-year follow-up MRIs were acquired in both knees of 78 participants (ACL-injured 2-10 years prior, 20-30 years, n = 20; 40-60 years, n = 14; healthy, 20-30 years, n = 23; 40-60 years, n = 21). Weight bearing femorotibial cartilages were manually segmented to determine cartilage thickness and laminar (deep and superficial) T2. 2-year changes were compared between ACL_in, ACL_unin and HEA knees using estimated marginal means (EMM) and group differences in femorotibial compartments, (sub-)regions, and location-independent ordered values (OV). Results: From baseline to 2-year follow-up, cartilage thickness decreased in at least 50 % of regions/subregions whereas significant T2 changes ([95 % CI] ∉ 0) were rare. In ACL_in, cartilage EMM thinning (adjusted: MRI acquisition time, participant age) was strongest in the lateral tibia (LT) and its subregions (∼50 μm). In the interior LT subregion, thinning was 46 [70, 22], 46 [70, 22] and 13 [34, 8]μm in ACL_in, ACL_unin and HEA, respectively. In OV1 and OV2 of ACL_in, thinning was 178 [207, 150] and 130 [148, 111] μm, respectively and greater than in HEA. No EMM group differences were found for 2-year change in T2. Conclusions: ACL-injured knees displayed greater cartilage thinning, particularly using location-independent measures. Change in T2, in contrast, was limited and not specific to injury. Our findings underscore the need for relevant thresholds of cartilage thickness and T2 changes, to define early OA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.