ReviewCurrent addiction reports2026
Does the Habit Theory of Addictions Extend to Disordered Gambling?
Review in Current addiction reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Associations Between Gambling Motives and More Severe Gambling Disorder - Does Gender Matter?Journal of gambling studies · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose of Review: 'Habit theory' is a pervasive framework that describes addiction as a transition from goal-directed use (e.g. of drugs) to habitual response, accompanied by a neurobiological shift in fronto-striatal brain circuitry. As a theory that has been explored in the context of substance addictions, this article evaluates the conceptual fit of habit theory to gambling behavior and gambling disorder, and summarizes recent empirical evidence. Recent Findings: Relevant research falls into two main themes. First, studies have compared behavioral markers of habit (e.g. the two-step task, Pavlovian-to-Instrumental Transfer effects) in groups with and without gambling problems. These studies find limited direct support for the hypothesis. Second, psychological research has begun to examine habit-like behaviors in naturalistic gambling. These studies find behavioral expressions consistent with habit formation, primarily during engagement with slot machines, but are yet to test key tenets of habit theory such as insensitivity to outcome devaluation. Summary: Modern gambling products (e.g. slot machines, in-play sports betting) create rich learning environments that may be highly amenable to habit formation. Further research is needed to develop and validate new tools for testing habit formation and habit strength / persistence in the context of gambling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.