Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41767824›Full record

ReviewCurrent addiction reports2026

Does the Habit Theory of Addictions Extend to Disordered Gambling?

Tim van Timmeren, Luke Clark

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current addiction reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tim van TimmerenDepartment of Social, Health, and Organisational Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0282-8269
Luke ClarkCentre for Gambling Research at UBC, Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-1103-2422

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose of Review: 'Habit theory' is a pervasive framework that describes addiction as a transition from goal-directed use (e.g. of drugs) to habitual response, accompanied by a neurobiological shift in fronto-striatal brain circuitry. As a theory that has been explored in the context of substance addictions, this article evaluates the conceptual fit of habit theory to gambling behavior and gambling disorder, and summarizes recent empirical evidence. Recent Findings: Relevant research falls into two main themes. First, studies have compared behavioral markers of habit (e.g. the two-step task, Pavlovian-to-Instrumental Transfer effects) in groups with and without gambling problems. These studies find limited direct support for the hypothesis. Second, psychological research has begun to examine habit-like behaviors in naturalistic gambling. These studies find behavioral expressions consistent with habit formation, primarily during engagement with slot machines, but are yet to test key tenets of habit theory such as insensitivity to outcome devaluation. Summary: Modern gambling products (e.g. slot machines, in-play sports betting) create rich learning environments that may be highly amenable to habit formation. Further research is needed to develop and validate new tools for testing habit formation and habit strength / persistence in the context of gambling.

Indexed as

Behavioral addictionDual-process modelGamblingGoal-directed controlHabits

Identifiers

PMID41767824
PMCPMC12945966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.