Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41767794›Full record

ArticleJournal of nursing management2026

Learners' Perspectives on Interprofessional Simulation and Co-Debriefing: An Exploratory Mixed-Methods Study.

José Luis Díaz-Agea, Álvaro Ros-Romero, César Leal-Costa, Gabriel Segura-López, Pedro Simón Cayuela-Fuentes, José Antonio Vera-Pérez, Juan Manuel Cánovas-Pallarés, Manuel Piñero-Zapata, César Cinesi-Gómez, María Gracia Adánez-Martínez and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nursing management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

José Luis Díaz-AgeaFaculty of Nursing, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain, um.es.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0818-0224
Álvaro Ros-RomeroFaculty of Nursing, Catholic University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain, ucam.edu.
César Leal-CostaFaculty of Nursing, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain, um.es.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7711-3877
Gabriel Segura-LópezFaculty of Nursing, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain, um.es.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0591-523X
Pedro Simón Cayuela-FuentesFaculty of Nursing, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain, um.es.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8846-3389
José Antonio Vera-PérezFaculty of Nursing, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain, um.es.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0700-2969
Juan Manuel Cánovas-PallarésFaculty of Nursing, Catholic University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain, ucam.edu.
Manuel Piñero-ZapataFaculty of Nursing, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain, um.es.
César Cinesi-GómezFaculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain, ucam.edu.
María Gracia Adánez-MartínezFaculty of Medicine, University of Murciam, Emergency Department of the 'Virgen de la Arrixaca' Hospital, IMIB, Murcia, Spain.
María José Pujalte-JesúsHealth Emergencies Service 061, Region de Murcia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Interprofessional simulation enhances both technical and nontechnical skills among healthcare professionals, improving their clinical practice. Co-debriefing, where two facilitators lead debriefing sessions, is a common approach in these trainings. This study aims to assess educational aspects of interprofessional simulation and co-debriefing in postgraduate medical and emergency nursing students. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study with a mixed-methods approach was conducted among postgraduate students ( Results: Students' perceptions were evaluated across six dimensions: applicability, satisfaction, motivation, safe environment, organization, and co-debriefing. Significant differences were found between medical and nursing students in all dimensions except applicability and organization. Overall, students rated interdisciplinary sessions and co-debriefing positively, though nurses highlighted areas for improvement, such as icebreaker activities, more dynamic simulations, and equal representation of both professions. Conclusions: While interprofessional simulation and co-debriefing were well received, participants-especially nurses-identified areas for enhancement to ensure a more balanced and engaging learning experience. By integrating quantitative outcomes with qualitative insights, the study highlights when co-debriefing adds value in interprofessional simulation and when single-facilitator approaches may be sufficient.

Indexed as

Interprofessional RelationsLearningPerceptionSimulation TrainingStudents, NursingAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleQualitative ResearchSurveys and Questionnairesco-debriefingemergencyexperiential learninghealthcare teamworkinterprofessional simulationmedical and nursing educationsimulation training

Identifiers

PMID41767794
PMCPMC12937087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.