Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41767782›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2026

Evaluation of point-of-care hemoglobin testing vs. central laboratory measurements in neonates: a prospective study in neonatal intensive care unit.

Vivian Chang, Wei Hou, Echezona T Maduekwe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vivian ChangDepartment of Pediatrics, Neonatology, Stony Brook Children's Hospital, Stony Brook, NY, United States.
Wei HouFamily, Population and Preventive Medicine, Stony Brook University Hospital, Stony Brook, NY, United States.
Echezona T MaduekweDepartment of Pediatrics, Neonatology, Stony Brook Children's Hospital, Stony Brook, NY, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Point-of-care (POC) testing for blood gas analysis is commonly used for neonates in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) to determine blood gases using small blood volumes. This helps reduce blood loss and speeds up treatment. However, many clinicians remain skeptical about the accuracy of POC hemoglobin results. Our study evaluated the agreement between POC testing and laboratory measurements of hemoglobin concentration in infants born at >28 weeks gestational age. Methods: This prospective cohort study analyzed 187 paired blood samples from infants born after 28 weeks of gestation admitted to the NICU between July 2023 and December 2024. Hemoglobin levels from paired blood samples were measured using two different Methods: a POC gas analyzer and a laboratory analyzer. The laboratory analyzer (Sysmex XN-9100®) requires a minimum of 500 µL of blood, while the POC analyzer (ABL90 Flex Radiometer®) only needs 65 µL. A Bland-Altman plot was utilized for statistical analysis to assess the agreement between the two methods and to identify any systematic differences. Results: Of 197 eligible patients, 187 were enrolled in the study, with a mean gestational age of 36.6 weeks (± 3.2) at birth. There was no significant difference between the results from laboratory arterial-venous samples (16.14 g/dL) and POC testing (16.04 g/dL; Conclusion: Point-of-care testing for hemoglobin analysis using arterial-venous samples may be an alternative method for quantifying hemoglobin in neonates born at a gestational age >28 weeks. However, due to notable discrepancies between capillary POC results and laboratory results, it is essential to exercise caution when interpreting hemoglobin measurements obtained from capillary POC testing.

Indexed as

blood gas analysishemoglobin concentrationneonatal intensive careneonatespoint-of-care testing

Identifiers

PMID41767782
PMCPMC12935908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.