Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41767775›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2026

Guidance for a clinical and forensic diagnosis of pediatric abusive head trauma: a narrative review.

Monica Concato, Anita Galic Mihic, Tijana Petrovic, Djordje M Alempijevic, Davide Radaelli, Stefano D'Errico

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Monica ConcatoDepartment of Medical Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Anita Galic MihicInstitute of Forensic Medicine and Criminalistics, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Tijana PetrovicFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Djordje M AlempijevicFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
Davide RadaelliDepartment of Medical Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.
Stefano D'ErricoDepartment of Medical Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The term Shaken Baby Syndrome, now largely replaced by the more general term abusive head trauma (AHT), poses significant challenges for forensic assessment and investigation. The clinical assessment of these cases remains a complex process that necessarily involves collecting a complete medical history, taking into account the caregivers and the child's socio-economic and family context, a thorough physical examination, and additional diagnostic investigations. In cases where the child has died, the autopsy-whether performed for investigative or purely diagnostic purposes-remains an essential step requiring a rigorous methodological approach, technical expertise, and in-depth knowledge of the subject. Guided by previously conducted instrumental examinations, the autopsy includes a fundamental macroscopic evaluation followed by the essential histological assessment of the injuries. Given the importance of the topic, and the implications of an erroneous conclusion for both the young patient and their family, this work aims to compile methodological updates from the last ten years, in order to promote greater uniformity in the medico-legal practice.

Indexed as

abusive head trauma (AHT)clinical diagnosisforensic diagnosisnon-accidental head injuries (NAHI)Shaken Baby Syndrome

Identifiers

PMID41767775
PMCPMC12946091

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.