ReviewFrontiers in pediatrics2026
Criteria for unmet need in paediatric populations and their families: a literature-based case study in haematological malignancies in upper-middle and high-income countries.
Review in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Unmet health-related needs (UHNs) in paediatric populations are often under-researched due to methodological challenges. Yet, understanding these UHNs is essential to improve health outcomes and quality of life for children. Importantly, their families also bear a substantial burden throughout the disease trajectory. This study (i) identifies UHN criteria specific to children and families, (ii) compare them with criteria included in the KCE NEED framework, and (iii) maps the methodological tools used to assess these needs. Methods: A scoping review was conducted following JBI methodology and reported using PRISMA-ScR. Selection of sources of evidence was conducted double-blind. UHNs were thematically analysed across health, healthcare and social domains, focusing on children with haematologic malignancies as a representative population. Studies were solely included if conducted in upper-middle and high-income countries. Results: The review ( Discussion: The multifaceted nature of UHNs in children with haematologic malignancies and their families calls for a holistic, age-appropriate approach to care. These findings may be extrapolated to broader paediatric populations, highlighting the need for age-dependent communication, sustained educational support, and comprehensive family-centred care. Systematic Review Registration: https://osf.io/xfqyw/overview.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.