ArticleFrontiers in physiology2025
Evaluation of bi-atrial dynamic electrophysiological properties in atrial septal defect patients.
Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Atrial septal defects (ASD) are associated with an increased incidence of atrial arrhythmias, but their electrophysiological consequences are poorly defined. We hypothesised that conduction and repolarisation would be preferentially altered in the right atrium of ASD patients. Objective: To quantify atrial conduction and repolarisation in ASD patients and determine the impact of structural remodelling on restitution properties. Methods: Patients with an ASD (n = 22) underwent bi-atrial electroanatomic mapping and quantification of effective refractory periods, longitudinal and transverse local conduction. The control group comprised 24 patients without an ASD undergoing ablation for paroxysmal AF. Results: Bipolar voltage was significantly lower in ASD patients (right atrium: 1.53 ± 0.46 mV versus 1.98 ± 0.59 mV, P = 0.017; left atrium: 1.71 ± 0.36 mV versus 2.06 ± 0.63 mV, P = 0.039). There was no significant difference in global conduction velocity in either atrium between ASD and control patients. Effective refractory periods at 600 ms were not significantly different between patient groups (right atrium: 247 ± 34.7 ms versus 224 ± 36.5 ms, P = 0.071; left atrium: 244 ± 23.9 ms versus 232 ± 40.4 ms, P = 0.29). However, both conduction and repolarisation demonstrated greater rate adaptation in ASD patients in both atria. Conclusion: Right atrial remodelling, characterised by atrial dilatation and increased low voltage, is present in ASD patients. During fixed rate pacing, conduction and repolarisation properties are similar between ASD and AF patients. However, the restitution properties of both conduction and repolarisation are more pronounced in ASD than AF patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.