Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41767749›Full record

ArticleExperimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.)2026

Poliovirus receptor (PVR) expression as a predictor of relapse in colorectal cancer: bioinformatics and virtual screening.

Sulaiman S Alhudaithi, Muhamed Hamza R Salih, Zaid H AlHusseini, Sarah M Almufadhili, Noura Alelayani, Ahmed H Bakheit, Hamad M Alkahtani, Hanadi H Asiri, Ali A Alshamrani, Ali R Alhoshani and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental biology and medicine (Maywood, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sulaiman S AlhudaithiDepartment of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Muhamed Hamza R SalihDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Zaid H AlHusseiniDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Sarah M AlmufadhiliDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Noura AlelayaniDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ahmed H BakheitDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Hamad M AlkahtaniDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Hanadi H AsiriDepartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ali A AlshamraniDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Ali R AlhoshaniDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Moureq R AlotaibiDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Homood M As SobeaiDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most frequently diagnosed malignancies worldwide. Despite advancements in CRC treatment strategies in recent years, disease recurrence remains a major problem; relapsed patients have a poorer prognosis and higher mortality risk. Several factors have been associated with CRC relapse. However, the role of immune checkpoints in CRC recurrence remains elusive. In this work, we aimed to investigate immune checkpoint genes correlated with recurrence in CRC, evaluate their potential as prognostic biomarkers, and identify promising immune checkpoint inhibitors through molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations. Clinical, genetic, and epigenetic data of relapsed and relapse-free CRC patients in the Cancer Genome Atlas were retrieved from the cBioportal database and evaluated. Subsequently, molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations studies were conducted to identify suitable poliovirus receptor (

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalReceptors, VirusAntigens, Differentiation, T-LymphocyteBiomarkers, TumorComputational BiologyHumansMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular Dynamics SimulationPrognosisReceptors, ImmunologicAntigens, Differentiation, T-LymphocyteBiomarkers, Tumorpoliovirus receptorReceptors, ImmunologicReceptors, VirusTIGIT protein, humancolorectal cancerpoliovirus receptorprognostic biomarkerrelapsevirtual screening

Identifiers

PMID41767749
PMCPMC12945842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.