Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41767733›Full record

ArticleGMS journal for medical education2026

Interprofessional education in healthcare professions - implementation status and preferences from the perspective of teaching staff.

Jann Niklas Vogel, Annemarie Bagner, Matthias Müller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GMS journal for medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jann Niklas VogelNeubrandenburg University of Applied Sciences, Department of Social Work, Education and Childcare, Neubrandenburg, Germany.
Annemarie BagnerNeubrandenburg University of Applied Sciences, Department of Social Work, Education and Childcare, Neubrandenburg, Germany.
Matthias MüllerNeubrandenburg University of Applied Sciences, Department of Social Work, Education and Childcare, Neubrandenburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Interprofessional thinking and behaviour are the key to high-quality and efficient healthcare provision. This requires specific skills which can be developed through interprofessional teaching and learning. This article sets out methods of implementation and preferences of interprofessional teaching in the education of healthcare professions from the perspective of teaching staff. Methodology: Semi-structured interviews (n=11) were carried out with teaching staff from four public schools for healthcare professions in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern. The data was evaluated using the methodological approach of content-structuring qualitative content analysis. Results: The implementation of interprofessional teaching and learning varies depending on the institution and teacher. It takes place in classrooms, in nursing skills labs, on excursions and project days, but requires a high degree of planning. Teaching staff favour case scenarios with a clear structure, which can be worked on by several professional groups or from various perspectives. Reflecting on profession-specific perspectives plays a particularly important role here. Digital formats such as blended learning, simulation labs as well as virtual and augmented reality are cited as supplementary learning formats, but often fail in their implementation due to a lack of technical equipment. Discussion & conclusion: In addition to political and institution-specific contexts for interprofessional teaching and learning, interprofessional educational formats are also required. These should be based on case scenarios and be modular so that individual teaching and learning content can be applied to various contexts. The integration of OER as well as digital learning formats can support both the implementation and preparation and follow-up of interprofessional learning activities.

Indexed as

FacultyHealth OccupationsInterprofessional EducationInterprofessional RelationsTeachingHumansInterviews as TopicQualitative Researchhealthcare traininginterprofessional collaborationinterprofessional educationinterprofessionalisminterprofessional learningskills

Identifiers

PMID41767733
PMCPMC12936926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.