ArticleGMS journal for medical education2026
Interprofessional education in healthcare professions - implementation status and preferences from the perspective of teaching staff.
Article in GMS journal for medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Interprofessional thinking and behaviour are the key to high-quality and efficient healthcare provision. This requires specific skills which can be developed through interprofessional teaching and learning. This article sets out methods of implementation and preferences of interprofessional teaching in the education of healthcare professions from the perspective of teaching staff. Methodology: Semi-structured interviews (n=11) were carried out with teaching staff from four public schools for healthcare professions in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern. The data was evaluated using the methodological approach of content-structuring qualitative content analysis. Results: The implementation of interprofessional teaching and learning varies depending on the institution and teacher. It takes place in classrooms, in nursing skills labs, on excursions and project days, but requires a high degree of planning. Teaching staff favour case scenarios with a clear structure, which can be worked on by several professional groups or from various perspectives. Reflecting on profession-specific perspectives plays a particularly important role here. Digital formats such as blended learning, simulation labs as well as virtual and augmented reality are cited as supplementary learning formats, but often fail in their implementation due to a lack of technical equipment. Discussion & conclusion: In addition to political and institution-specific contexts for interprofessional teaching and learning, interprofessional educational formats are also required. These should be based on case scenarios and be modular so that individual teaching and learning content can be applied to various contexts. The integration of OER as well as digital learning formats can support both the implementation and preparation and follow-up of interprofessional learning activities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.