ArticleGMS journal for medical education2026
Optimization of descriptors and cross-references across the different versions of the German National Competence Based Catalogue of Learning Objectives for Undergraduate Medical Education (NKLM).
Article in GMS journal for medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- DEGRO consensus framework for undergraduate radiation therapy teaching in Germany: a white paper with integrated guidance on artificial intelligence in medical education.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026Article
- National Competence Based Catalogue of Learning Objectives for Undergraduate Medical Education (NKLM) - process description over the last 15 years.GMS journal for medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The National Competence Based Catalogue of Learning Objectives for Undergraduate Medical Education (NKLM) has been developed as a curricular framework since 2009 and was published in version 1.0 in 2015. Refining the clinical disease descriptors and their associated cross-references (CR) is necessary to improve the clarity and usability of the NKLM. This study examines whether this optimization could be achieved through targeted interventions during the further development of the NKLM 1.0 via the intermediate versions NKLM 1.0 (neo) and NKLM 2.0 to NKLM 2.1.. Methods: The revision of the NKLM was supported by structured interventions such as the conversion of free text into CR, the introduction of essential and non-essential CR, and the linking of clinical descriptors exclusively to selected learning objective chapters. Subsequently, an analysis was performed to determine whether the number of descriptors and associated CR had been reduced and whether the clinical competencies were completely specified. Results: The number of clinical descriptors set per disease was significantly reduced (by 29% for diagnostics, 17% for therapy, 75% for emergency measures, and 66% for prevention/rehabilitation). The number of CR was also significantly reduced. At the same time, all existing gaps in the network (consisting of clinical descriptors and associated CR for learning objectives) were closed. Conclusion: The interventions resulted in a clearer network of descriptors and CR, providing a more precise definition of the content to be learned. This means that the NKLM can presumably better fulfill its purpose with regard to the constructive alignment of learning, teaching, and assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.