ArticleFrontiers in surgery2026
Three-pedicle haemorrhoidectomy in the outpatient setting: the critical roles of information and organization.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Three-pedicle haemorrhoidectomy (Milligan-Morgan) has traditionally raised concerns in outpatient settings due to postoperative pain and complications. Since 2015, we have performed this procedure on an outpatient basis. This study aimed to assess patients' views on such care. Methods: We retrospectively included patients who underwent outpatient haemorrhoidectomy at our centre in 2020. A satisfaction questionnaire was sent. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients reporting good or excellent satisfaction. Secondary outcomes included hospital admissions, postoperative complications, and predictors of dissatisfaction. Ethics approval was obtained. Results: Among 392 patients, 292 underwent outpatient surgery (74%); 176 (60%) completed the questionnaire. Mean age was 52 ± 12 years; 64% were male. Good or excellent satisfaction was reported by 84% of respondents. Postoperatively, 9% required hospital admission, 48% contacted the hospital (nurse 52%, physician 48%) and 23% had unscheduled visits (clinic 65%, emergency department 35%). Complications occurred in 28% of cases, including discomfort, nausea, bleeding, urinary retention, and faecal impaction. Dissatisfaction was associated with poor preoperative explanations (surgeon Conclusions: Outpatient haemorrhoidectomy is acceptable to the majority of patients. However, thorough information and appropriate organisation are essential. As a result, 95% of these procedures are now performed on an outpatient basis at our centre.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.