Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41767667›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2025

Modified STRONGkids outperforms PYMS for WHO-defined malnutrition: a screening-to-action pathway for pediatric wards.

Hong Chen, Yu Zhang, Hongwei Han

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hong ChenDepartment of Pediatrics, Wenzhou People's Hospital, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Yu ZhangDepartment of Pediatrics, Wenzhou People's Hospital, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Hongwei HanDepartment of Pediatrics, Wenzhou People's Hospital, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this paper was to understand the nutritional status of hospitalized children and explore the clinical application value of the modified STRONGkids and PYMS screening tools. Methods: Nutritional risk screening was performed using the modified STRONGkids and PYMS tools on 302 children admitted to the pediatric department of our hospital between April 2021 and March 2023. Differences in clinical outcomes and biochemical indicators under different nutritional statuses were analyzed. Results: Overall, 302 children were included in the current study. The modified STRONGkids screening tool identified 18 (5.96%) children at high risk of malnutrition, 210 (69.54%) at moderate risk, and 74 (24.50%) at low risk. The PYMS screening tool identified 16 (5.30%) children at high risk, 152 (50.33%) at moderate risk, and 134 (44.37%) at low risk. According to WHO nutritional assessment standards, 150 (49.67%) children were identified as borderline malnourished or malnourished. Both the modified STRONGkids and PYMS evaluations indicated that children with digestive system diseases had a significantly higher risk of malnutrition compared with those who had other systemic diseases. Moreover, children under 1 year of age had a significantly higher risk of malnutrition compared with other age groups ( Conclusion: Children with digestive system diseases and those under 1 year of age are at high risk for malnutrition. Both the modified STRONGkids and PYMS tools can effectively identify children at risk of malnutrition, with the modified STRONGkids tool demonstrating better application results.

Indexed as

digestive system diseasesnutritionalnutritional risk screeningPYMSSTRONGkids

Identifiers

PMID41767667
PMCPMC12936043

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.