ReviewInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature2026
Effects of atrial fibrillation on cerebral perfusion and cognitive function: A systematic review.
Review in International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Recent highlights from theInternational journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) has been associated with cognitive impairment. Impaired cerebral perfusion is a proposed mechanism, though evidence remains inconclusive, particularly in patients with concomitant heart failure (HF). We conducted a systematic review in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. PubMed and EMBASE were searched from database inception to May 9, 2025 for adult studies comparing cerebral perfusion in AF and sinus rhythm (SR). Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-E and ROBINS-I; certainty of evidence was graded using GRADE. Twenty-three studies were included (11 interventional, 1 observational, 11 cross-sectional). Measurement methods and effect sizes were heterogeneous. Most studies had serious/critical risk of bias, and certainty of evidence was low. Twenty-two studies concluded that AF may impair cerebral perfusion, while one found no such effect. Nine studies reported cognitive testing, and five demonstrated impaired performance in AF or improvement following SR restoration. In HF subgroup analyses (2 studies), perfusion was lower in HF patients with AF than those in SR. A third study found higher pulsatile index in HF patients with AF than those without HF, but no difference in peak, mean or diastolic cerebral blood flow velocities. Current clinical evidence suggests that AF may impair cerebral perfusion and contribute to cognitive decline. However, methodological limitations and heterogeneity limit the conclusions, and further longitudinal studies with standardized perfusion metrics are needed, including in concomitant HF where data are scarce.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.