Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41767633›Full record

Trial reportOpen forum infectious diseases2026

Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling and Target Attainment of Cefepime in Critically Ill Pediatric Patients.

Stephanie L Rolsma, Marisa Blackman, Cole Beck, Ahmad Dbouk, Foday Morovia, Faith Glover, Gabriella Ess, Katelyn Dohler, Brian Bridges, Leena Choi and 1 more

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Open forum infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Stephanie L RolsmaVanderbilt Vaccine Research Program, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7636-2222
Marisa BlackmanDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9898-185X
Cole BeckDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6849-6255
Ahmad DboukDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Foday MoroviaVanderbilt Vaccine Research Program, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4013-2572
Faith GloverVanderbilt Vaccine Research Program, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Gabriella EssVanderbilt Vaccine Research Program, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1329-7460
Katelyn DohlerVanderbilt Vaccine Research Program, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2639-1396
Brian BridgesDivision of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2209-2121
Leena ChoiDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2544-7090
C Buddy CreechVanderbilt Vaccine Research Program, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8276-9053

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cefepime dosing guidelines are well defined in healthy populations but have not been studied extensively in critically ill children who often have significant alterations in antibiotic pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD). Cefepime dosing optimization is important for patient outcomes. Method: We prospectively enrolled critically ill children receiving cefepime. Plasma samples were collected at opportunistic time points. Cefepime plasma concentrations were measured by liquid-chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Population PK (popPK) analysis was conducted with a priori selected covariates. The final covariate model was used to perform probability of target attainment (PTA) analysis. Results: Data from 84 participants were analyzed. A 2-compartment with proportional error model was selected as the base model. Inclusion of weight and creatinine clearance (CrCl) improved model fit. Estimated breakpoints-the highest minimum inhibitory concentration with ≥90% pharmacokinetic target attainment-were 2-fold higher for 3-hour compared with 30-minute infusions for q8h dosing regimens. For q12h regimens, 3-hour infusions also yielded 2-fold higher breakpoints for the lowest target. Continuous compared with 3-hour infusions resulted in 4- to 16-fold higher breakpoints at the same daily dose at the higher targets. Increased CrCl led to reduced PTA. Conclusions: Given the variability observed in critically ill children, clinicians should consider incorporating therapeutic drug monitoring and popPK models to determine optimal dosing in this population. The use of extended infusions and more frequent or continuous dosing is beneficial for PK/PD target achievement, particularly for

Indexed as

beta-lactamscritical carepediatricspharmacokineticspopulation pharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID41767633
PMCPMC12947848

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.