ArticleJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology2026
Computer-Aided Detection-Assisted Colonoscopy Teaches Gaze to Improve Adenoma Detection in First-Year Gastroenterology Fellows.
Article in JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Commentary on "Impact of Computer-Aided Detection on Endoscopist's Gaze-Shift Distance During Colonoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial".Journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Article
- Computer-Aided Detection-Assisted Colonoscopy Teaches Gaze to Improve Adenoma Detection in First-Year Gastroenterology Fellows.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: The impact of computer-aided detection (CADe)-assisted colonoscopy on gastroenterology fellow trainees remains incompletely defined. In this study, adenoma detection rates (ADR) with and without CADe were assessed among gastroenterology fellows. Methods: This quality improvement study compared 1580 colonoscopies performed with and without CADe. The primary outcome was the ADR in fellow-assisted colonoscopies, with and without CADe, stratified by fellowship year. ADRs were compared among procedures assisted by first-year fellows; those assisted by second- and third-year fellows (combined); and those performed by faculty without a fellow. Results: Age, birth sex, race, body mass index, procedure indication, non-neoplastic resection rate, and withdrawal time were similar. CADe-assisted colonoscopy significantly improved the ADR for first-year fellows (66.2% vs. 48.6%, Conclusion: CADe-assisted colonoscopy improved ADR in first-year fellow-assisted procedures. The bounding box created by the system's artificial intelligence may enhance polyp detection by improving peripheral gaze patterns in novice endoscopists. Further studies are needed to validate this hypothesis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.