Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41767596›Full record

ReviewResearch (Washington, D.C.)2026

Foundation Models Meet Medical Image Interpretation.

Licheng Jiao, Jiayao Hao, Ruiyang Li, Lingling Li, Xu Liu, Fang Liu, Wenping Ma, Puhua Chen, Zhongjian Huang, Jingyi Yang and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Research (Washington, D.C.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Licheng JiaoSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Xidian University, Xi'an, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3354-9617
Jiayao HaoSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Xidian University, Xi'an, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2546-6989
Ruiyang LiSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Xidian University, Xi'an, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3390-2599
Lingling LiSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Xidian University, Xi'an, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6130-2518
Xu LiuSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Xidian University, Xi'an, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8780-5455
Fang LiuSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Xidian University, Xi'an, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5669-9354
Wenping MaSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Xidian University, Xi'an, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8872-2195
Puhua ChenSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Xidian University, Xi'an, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5472-1426
Zhongjian HuangSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Xidian University, Xi'an, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2004-0619
Jingyi YangSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Xidian University, Xi'an, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1577-1484
Jiaxuan ZhaoSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Xidian University, Xi'an, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2827-0681
Qigong SunSense Time, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6842-6065

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Facing challenges such as limited annotated data and insufficient model generalization in medical deep learning, foundation models (FMs) are reshaping the paradigm of medical image interpretation through large-scale pretraining and efficient fine-tuning. Unlike traditional models focused on single modality and task, FMs enable multi-modal representation and task-agnostic transfer, adapting to various downstream applications without extensive annotation or retraining. This paper systematically reviews the research progress on medical FMs, focusing on medical tasks, datasets, and evaluation metrics. It covers key interpretation tasks such as classification, segmentation, generation, and prognosis prediction. At the data level, it integrates multi-source data including 2-dimensional (2D)/3D medical imaging, vision-language data, electronic health records (EHRs), physiological signals, and bioinformatics data, and summarizes the evaluation metrics for each task. On this basis, the paper categorizes and analyzes mainstream medical FMs, including pretrained models, vision FMs, vision-language FMs, and extended multi-modal FMs, providing a systematic comparison of their performance and characteristics. Furthermore, we innovatively proposes the IPIU medical FM platform, which integrates large-scale medical data, universal vision models, medical vision-language models, and medical large language models, and verifies its effectiveness in typical clinical tasks. In addition, this work is the first to systematically analyze the key challenges and emerging trends of medical FMs across 12 critical dimensions, including data, modeling, security, and computational resources, filling the gaps in the existing reviews in systematic sorting and forward-looking analysis. Our aim is to provide theoretical support and practical reference for the sustainable development of medical FMs. Related resources and literature lists will be open sourced on https://github.com/JYAOii/Foundation-Models-meet-Medical-Image-Interpretation.

Identifiers

PMID41767596
PMCPMC12946388

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.