Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41767562›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2026

A dual-loop chemostat to investigate multi-species biofilms on implant surfaces under adjustable flow conditions.

Jan-Ole Reese, Ingrid Maria Castro Lund, Håvard Jostein Haugen, Athanasios Saragliadis, Ståle Petter Lyngstadaas, Dirk Linke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jan-Ole ReeseDepartment of Biosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Ingrid Maria Castro LundDepartment of Biosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Håvard Jostein HaugenDepartment of Biomaterials, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Athanasios SaragliadisDepartment of Biosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Ståle Petter LyngstadaasDepartment of Biomaterials, Institute of Clinical Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Dirk LinkeDepartment of Biosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Natural biofilms are typically composed of a mix of different microbial species and are often exposed to strong shear forces resulting from liquid flow. Simple biofilm models that attempt to study biofilms are based on a single species and on static growth conditions. To overcome these limitations, we developed a modular dual-loop reactor that decouples bacterial cultivation from hydrodynamic exposure, enabling independent control of nutrient availability (and thus, cell density) and flow rate (and thus, shear stress). Importantly, the system allows for testing different surface materials in a systematic manner. To validate our setup, we used a community of six keystone members of oral biofilms in conjunction with titanium materials of defined roughness that mimic dental implant surfaces. We found that biofilm mass, robustness, and species distribution not only differ significantly between static and dynamic growth conditions, but also vary strongly with different flow velocities. The biofilms formed under flow could be separated into two fractions, one that washed away very easily, and a more robust, basal layer. At low shear forces, overall biofilm mass was the highest, but at the expense of biofilm robustness. At medium shear forces, the robust fraction of the biofilm had the highest relative content of extracellular matrix. At the highest flow rates, the biofilm mass was low, but late colonizers (represented by the oral pathogens

Indexed as

biofilm modelflowimplant materialsmulti-species biofilmoral biofilmshear stress

Identifiers

PMID41767562
PMCPMC12946110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.