ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2026
A dual-loop chemostat to investigate multi-species biofilms on implant surfaces under adjustable flow conditions.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The impact of DNA extraction methods on species quantification and apparent community composition of in vitro oral biofilms.FEMS microbiology letters · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Natural biofilms are typically composed of a mix of different microbial species and are often exposed to strong shear forces resulting from liquid flow. Simple biofilm models that attempt to study biofilms are based on a single species and on static growth conditions. To overcome these limitations, we developed a modular dual-loop reactor that decouples bacterial cultivation from hydrodynamic exposure, enabling independent control of nutrient availability (and thus, cell density) and flow rate (and thus, shear stress). Importantly, the system allows for testing different surface materials in a systematic manner. To validate our setup, we used a community of six keystone members of oral biofilms in conjunction with titanium materials of defined roughness that mimic dental implant surfaces. We found that biofilm mass, robustness, and species distribution not only differ significantly between static and dynamic growth conditions, but also vary strongly with different flow velocities. The biofilms formed under flow could be separated into two fractions, one that washed away very easily, and a more robust, basal layer. At low shear forces, overall biofilm mass was the highest, but at the expense of biofilm robustness. At medium shear forces, the robust fraction of the biofilm had the highest relative content of extracellular matrix. At the highest flow rates, the biofilm mass was low, but late colonizers (represented by the oral pathogens
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.