ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
An interpretable machine-learning model for predicting in-hospital mortality in patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence Models for Mortality and Outcome Prediction in Intensive Care Unit Sepsis: A Systematic Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Development and validation of a temporal staging-based nomogram for 1-year mortality in sepsis-associated acute kidney injury.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (S-AKI) is a severe complication in critically ill patients, linked to increased short-term mortality and chronic kidney disease. Existing prognostic tools like SOFA and SAPS II lack full representation of intricate clinical variable interactions. Machine learning (ML) models have potential in intensive care, but few validated and interpretable models focus on the in-hospital mortality rate of patients with S-AKI. This study aims to create and validate ML models for forecasting in-hospital mortality in S-AKI patients, identifying the most effective predictive model. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from the MIMIC-IV 3.0 database to identify adult ICU patients who met theSepsis-3.0(Sepsis-3 was defined as suspected infection with an acute increase in SOFA score ≥2) and KDIGO criteria for S-AKI. Additionally, a prospective cohort study from the General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University spanning 2023 to 2025 was included. Predictors recorded within 24 h of ICU admission included demographic information, comorbidities, vital signs, laboratory results, treatments, and severity scores. Variables with more than 20% missing data were excluded, and the remaining data were processed using interpolation. Feature selection was performed using the Boruta algorithm, and five machine learning models were trained (XGBoost, Random Forest, LightGBM, Decision tree, logistic regression). Model performance evaluation was based on metrics such as AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, and clinical efficacy assessed through decision curve analysis. To enhance model interpretability, the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was employed. Results: Among 16,800 patients with S-AKI, non-survivors(in-hospital mortality) exhibited older age, higher disease severity scores, more pronounced fluid overload, poorer renal function, metabolic acidosis, coagulation disorders, and heightened inflammatory responses. The XGBoost model demonstrated superior discriminative power (AUC 0.8799 ) in internal validation, surpassing other ML models, with exceptional sensitivity, accuracy, and F1 score. Decision curve analysis revealed that LightGBM offered the most significant net clinical benefit across various threshold probabilities. SHAP analysis consistently identified SAPS II score, AKI stage, oxygenation index, and key biochemical markers (e.g., serum sodium and blood urea nitrogen) as primary contributors to mortality risk, while the added value of basic demographic variables was limited. External validation confirmed that the XGBoost model has potential discrimination and robustness, highlighting the robustness and wide applicability of the machine learning-based prognostic framework. Conclusion: This study established an externally validated and interpretable ML model for riskstratification in S-AKI, enabling early identification of high-risk patients, personalized management strategies, and enhanced clinical outcomes in sepsis care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.