SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2026
Effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation for postoperative nausea, vomiting and pain in cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing breast surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation for postoperative nausea and vomiting in gynecological laparoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trial protocol.Annals of medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) in relieving postoperative pain and reducing the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients undergoing cancer surgery. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Wanfang databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between January 2015 and May 2025. Postoperative pain scores at different time points, assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) or numerical rating scale (NRS), as well as the incidence of PONV, postoperative nausea (PON), and postoperative vomiting (POV), were extracted. Subgroup analyses were performed according to the timing of TEAS intervention and pain assessment methods. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB) tool, and the meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 software. Results: A total of 16 randomized controlled trials involving 2,017 postoperative cancer patients were included (1,125 in the TEAS group and 892 in the control group). Meta-analysis of 13 studies showed that TEAS significantly reduced postoperative pain scores (SMD = -1.19, 95% CI: -1.42 to -0.95, Conclusion: TEAS appears to be an effective adjunctive intervention for alleviating postoperative pain and nausea in patients undergoing cancer surgery, showing clear clinical advantages. Further high-quality, large-scale, and multicenter studies are warranted to confirm its long-term efficacy and to promote the standardization of TEAS protocols for broader clinical application. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251038890.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.