ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Point-of-care ultrasound improves the diagnosis of heart failure in patients with dyspnea in primary care.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Heart failure (HF) is one of the most frequent and clinically important causes of dyspnea, and its recognition in primary care is often hindered by limited access to advanced diagnostics. This study aimed to evaluate whether general practitioners (GPs), after brief training, can use point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) to improve the diagnostic accuracy of HF in patients with new-onset dyspnea. Methods: In this prospective validation study, 112 consecutive adult patients with unexplained new-onset dyspnea were initially enrolled across four primary care practices. After clinical evaluation, 102 patients underwent a standardized lung and focused cardiac ultrasound by GPs, using handheld ultrasound machines. B-line quantification and visual assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were performed. Diagnoses before and after PoCUS were compared to the final diagnosis established by a cardiologist using standard echocardiography. Agreement metrics and diagnostic accuracy measures were calculated. Results: Post-PoCUS assessments by GPs showed significantly improved diagnostic performance for HF (sensitivity: 86.8%, specificity: 88.2%, positive predictive value: 93.7%, and negative predictive value: 76.5%) compared to pre-PoCUS clinical judgment (sensitivity: 85.3%, specificity: 38.2%, positive predictive value: 73.4%, and negative predictive value: 56.5%). Agreement with the final diagnosis increased substantially (Cohen's Conclusion: A brief, focused training enables GPs to use PoCUS effectively for the detection of HF in patients with dyspnea. Integrating lung and focused cardiac ultrasound into routine primary care may substantially improve diagnostic accuracy, optimize patient management, and reduce unnecessary referrals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.