Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41767522›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Development and validation of a predictive model for pathological upgrading in colorectal polyps based on endoscopic forceps biopsy.

Ziyao Cheng, Chang Zhang, Feng Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ziyao Cheng *Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Chang Zhang *Department of Gastroenterology, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Feng YuDepartment of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To develop and validate a model for predicting the risk of pathological upgrading in patients with colorectal polyps. Methods: This prospective study enrolled 616 patients who were diagnosed with colorectal polyps by endoscopic forceps biopsy at the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from August 2022 to October 2025. After exclusion, 593 patients were included in the final analysis. They were randomly divided into a training cohort ( Results: The polyp was located in the rectum, with an MTD ≥ 30 mm. The polyp had a villous structure. Erosion of the polyp and redness of the polyp surface were identified as significant predictors of pathological escalation in patients with colorectal polyps. A nomogram developed based on these predictors showed excellent predictive performance. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the training set and the test set is 0.890 and 0.922, respectively. The calibration curve and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test show a high degree of consistency between the predicted and observed results, and DCA confirms that the model has superior clinical practicality. Conclusion: This study developed and validated a risk prediction model for pathological upgrade of colorectal polyps based on five endoscopic factors, including rectal location, maximum tumor diameter (MTD) ≥ 30 mm, villous structure, erosion, and a red surface color. The model serves as a practical clinical tool that allows endoscopists to assess patient risk with high accuracy before treatment. By helping identify high-risk polyps that may need wider resection or closer follow-up, the model supports more personalized treatment decisions and may reduce both under-treatment and over-treatment. Its use is expected to improve individual patient management and enhance the effectiveness of colorectal cancer prevention.

Indexed as

colorectal polypsnomogrampathological upgradepredictive modelrisk factor

Identifiers

PMID41767522
PMCPMC12945755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.