Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41767501›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Career commitment and sense of calling in nursing students: a longitudinal study.

Tingting Ding, Jiaqi Shi, Wenjing Li, Feifei Xiong, Huihui Xu, Chengjia Zhao, Guohua Zhang, Chen Cong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tingting DingThe First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Jiaqi ShiThe First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Wenjing LiSchool of Nursing, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Feifei XiongSchool of Nursing, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Huihui XuDepartment of Psychology, School of Mental Health, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.
Chengjia ZhaoSchool of Education, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China.
Guohua ZhangKey Research Center of Philosophy and Social Sciences of Zhejiang Province, Institute of Medical Humanities, Wenzhou Medical University, China.
Chen CongDepartment of Publicity Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Under China's one-child policy, the new generation of nursing students has gradually entered the workforce. Their career commitment, career self-efficacy, and sense of calling have undergone changes. It is necessary to assess the relationships and underlying mechanisms among these factors in order to stabilize the nursing workforce and cultivate high-quality clinical nursing professionals. Methods: A cross-lagged design was used, with a total of 693 nursing students participating in September and December 2022. The 27-item undergraduate career commitment scale, the Chinese version of career self-efficacy scale, and the brief calling scale were measured over time. Results: The relationships between career commitment, career self-efficacy, and sense of calling differed by only child and non-only child nursing undergraduates. Conclusion: It is important to introduce specific measures aimed at enhancing the quality of nursing education and implementing effective nursing management methods to ensure the stability of the nursing workforce.

Indexed as

career commitmentcareer self-efficacynursing studentsonly child and non-only childsense of calling

Identifiers

PMID41767501
PMCPMC12945806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.