Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41767465›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs scholar2026

State laws that address workplace violence in health care settings.

Brianna Lombardi, Colleen Tapen, Erin Fraher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs scholar, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Brianna LombardiCarolina Health Workforce Research Center, Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27516, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3146-496X
Colleen TapenCarolina Health Workforce Research Center, Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27516, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9104-8246
Erin FraherCarolina Health Workforce Research Center, Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27516, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3592-8100

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Workplace violence (WPV) against health care workers is a longstanding challenge that impacts the well-being of workers and patients. State legislative efforts to address WPV against health care workers have accelerated in recent years, particularly following the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: This study conducted a review of WPV-related enacted laws in health care settings across all 50 states over the last 10 years. Results: As of June 2024, 48 states had enacted at least 1 WPV law, and some states have enacted 2 or more laws. State laws were categorized into 3 types: penalties, prevention, and remediation. Forty-five states had laws that penalize perpetrators of WPV, 27 enacted prevention laws, and 23 had remediation laws. Ten states had laws combining penalties with either prevention or remediation, 17 states had laws covering all 3 categories, while 3 states had only prevention and remediation laws. Conclusion: Understanding variation in state WPV laws is important to future efforts to evaluate the efficacy of different legislative approaches. This study provides a landscape for federal and state government to understand legislative trends, and can inform health systems on strategies that can be used to prevent and address WPV.

Indexed as

health workforcestate legislationstate policyworkplace violence

Identifiers

PMID41767465
PMCPMC12937582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.