Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41767429›Full record

ReviewPsychoradiology2026

Extending psychoradiology of emotion regulation from mental health to adaptiveness promotion.

Tingting Wu, Jiajin Yuan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Psychoradiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tingting WuCollege of Physical Education, Xihua University, Chengdu 610039 Sichuan, China.
Jiajin YuanThe Laboratory for Affect Cognition and Regulation (ACRLAB), Institute of Brain and Psychological Sciences, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu 610066, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5630-2230

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emotion regulation (ER) research has, for decades, focused on mental health outcomes, such as emotional recovery and wellbeing reinstatement, in behavioral, physiological, and neural measures across different regulatory strategies. Although important, the practical significance of ER research should not only be limited to mental health, but also needs to consider aiding people's real-time adaptive behavior, to meet varying environmental demands or goals flexibly. In this paper, we propose an idea of ER adaptiveness that pays equal attention to both mental health outcomes, and how an ER strategy may be used to facilitate functional adaptiveness in meeting distinct goals. For instance, research of ER adaptiveness needs to highlight how to design regulatory strategies for the purpose of promoting cognitive, behavior, or social functions (nonaffective goal) in addition to that of affective wellbeing, and how to help a learned strategy work flexibly in changing contexts (affective goal). Lastly, taking application in sport psychology for example, we propose potential directions of how ER adaptiveness research may help participants to improve motor performance in competitive sports.

Indexed as

adaptive behavioremotion regulation adaptivenessmental healthmotor performancesport psychology

Identifiers

PMID41767429
PMCPMC12947156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.