ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2026
Uric acid-to-albumin ratio as a cardiometabolic marker for predicting adverse outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation: evidence from two independent cohorts.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Uric acid-based nutritional and inflammatory biomarkers for predicting cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic syndrome and mortality: a population-based study with external validation.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Predictive Value of Uric Acid-to-Albumin Ratio for Left Atrial Thrombus or Spontaneous Echo Contrast in Patients with Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is closely associated with metabolic dysfunction. The uric acid-to-albumin ratio (UAR), integrating oxidative stress, inflammation, and nutritional status, reflect cardiometabolic burden, but evidence linking UAR to AF prognosis remains limited. Methods: We analyzed clinical data from 1,908 AF patients at West China Hospital, with external validation from the MIMIC database (n=1,366). Associations were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analyses, restricted cubic splines, and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. Incremental prognostic value beyond the CHA Results: Baseline characteristics differed across UAR quartiles, with high UARs associated with substantial burdens of metabolic comorbidities, heart failure, renal dysfunction, and elevated inflammatory and cardiac biomarkers. Mortality was higher in the highest UAR quartile (log-rank P<0.001). In the primary cohort, restricted cubic splines showed a J-shaped association between UAR and 1-year mortality (P for nonlinearity <0.001). In fully adjusted Cox models, UAR (per SD) predicted 1-year all-cause mortality in the primary cohort (HR 1.162, 95% CI 1.036-1.304) and in the MIMIC cohort (HR 1.137, 95% CI 1.092-1.185). Adding UAR to the CHA Conclusion: UAR is an independent predictor of mortality in AF and captures cardiometabolic remodeling beyond conventional risk assessment. As a readily available biomarker, UAR may facilitate metabolically guided risk stratification and individualized management in AF populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.