ArticleHealth science reports2026
Surgeons' Experiences After Surgical Errors: Insights From a Urology Department.
Article in Health science reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Surgical practice is rewarding but also challenging, and adverse patient events can deeply affect surgeons. In this study, we explored how such events influence surgeons' personal well-being, emotional state, and professional performance. Methods: This qualitative descriptive study was conducted using semi-structured interviews with 13 urology faculty members and residents at Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Thirteen participants, including four faculty members and nine residents, were interviewed to understand their experiences and coping strategies with surgical errors. Types of surgical errors in the field of urology included technical, cognitive, clinical decision-making, unintentional, fatigue-related, diagnostic, and equipment- or environment-related errors. Six themes were emerged regarding participants' experiences including psychological and emotional impact, impact on professional practice, social support and relationships, external contributing factors, access to psychological support, and legal consequences. Conclusion: Our study showed that adverse events in surgery affect surgeons both personally and professionally. Supporting surgeons through these experiences, by institutional programs such as establishing formal counseling centers, can reduce stress and enhance learning. Recognizing that mistakes are part of surgical practice and using them as opportunities for growth can benefit both surgeons and their patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.