ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025
Accelerating digital innovation in clinical neuropsychology: simulation approach to support medical device certification.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In recent years, the focus on digitization of neuropsychological procedures in memory clinics has become paramount. Several teleneuropsychology platforms have been developed for testing patients with cognitive deficits, but only a few have been registered as medical devices (MD) being available in clinical practice. Hereby, we present a simulation-based novel approach designed to test technical performance and provide pre-clinical validation of a novel teleneuropsychology platform (i.e., Tenèpsia®) as required for the certification of Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) under the European regulation 2017/745 (MDR). Methods: Six dummy cognitive profiles simulating virtual patients with different cognitive performances were created. Five internal and two external experts evaluated simulated performances for representativeness, coherence and credibility. Results: One cognitively unimpaired and five mild cognitive impairment (MCI) profiles were considered. Demographic features and target cognitive scores were derived by reference literature for each simulated user. Representativeness was rated as more than 75% accurate by internal and external experts. Coherence and credibility were considered adequate to support SaMD certification. Conclusions: Certification of digital solutions as SaMD may require costly and time-consuming validation procedures. Simulation-based approach based on synthetic data is a valid method to overcome this limitation, that can be easily implemented to test platform, accelerating innovation in teleneuropsychology and providing adequate evidence of safety, efficacy and long-term comparability with the standard of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.