ArticleNeuroscience of consciousness2026
Exploring the role of micro-valence in the phenomenal space: insights from similarity judgments and deep learning models.
Article in Neuroscience of consciousness, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Confidence in naturalistic decision making.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2026Article
- The value of consciousness: experiences worth having.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Is valence an intrinsic dimension of conscious experience, as different authors have suggested? If so, all conscious experiences, and hence all conscious perceptions, should be valenced, even if only minimally so, and similarity judgments should be at least partly driven by one's affective dispositions. Leveraging the concept of micro-valence, we explore the extent to which valence judgments correlate with similarity judgments and with the different stages of processing in deep neural networks (DNNs). One hundred forty-nine participants provided both similarity and valence judgments for 120 images of everyday objects, using an odd-one-out task (Study 1), a spatial arrangement task (Study 2), and the Birthday task, which asks people to choose an object they would like to keep (or give away) as their birthday gift. We also extracted activations from the layers of DNNs trained to classify objects in response to the same images. Representation similarity analysis and multidimensional scaling analyses highlight the role of micro-valence in the similarity space, suggesting that valence permeates similarity judgments. DNN analyses show that this valence-similarity relationship is not entirely mediated by stimulus perceptual features and suggest that low-level visual features play a role in the computation of valence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.