Basin ecological function zoning based on gross ecosystem product.

Xiaoyang Li, Xiangfang Meng, Zhaohua Lu, Jingkuan Sun, Meng Zhang

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xiaoyang LiSchool of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan 056038, China.

Xiangfang MengInstitute of Restoration Ecology, China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing, Beijing 100083, China.

Zhaohua LuInstitute of Restoration Ecology, China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing, Beijing 100083, China.

Jingkuan SunShandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Eco-Environmental Science for Yellow River Delta, Shandong University of Aeronautics, Binzhou 256600, China.

Meng ZhangInstitute of Restoration Ecology, China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing, Beijing 100083, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ecological function zoning is a fundamental task for scientifically coordinating economic development and ecological protection. It constructed a comprehensive gross ecosystem product (GEP) accounting index system of the terrestrial ecosystem, and ecological function zoning was carried out through principal component analysis. It showed that from 2005 to 2020, the GEP rose from 14201.29 billion yuan to 28702.22 billion yuan in the Yellow River Basin (YRB), while the GEP increased from 23731.23 billion yuan to 48866.62 billion yuan in the Yangtze River Basin (YZRB); EPV, ERV, and ECV generally showed an upward trend. ECV experienced a rapid increase in the upstream region of the YRB and in the midstream area of the YZRB. Based on GEP accounting, it scientifically reflected the potential value of ecosystem service functions and provided an important way to improve the ecological compensation mechanism and guide natural capital into ecological industrialization.

Indexed as

Earth sciencesEcologyEnvironmental monitoringEnvironmental science

Identifiers

PMID41767266

DOI10.1016/j.isci.2026.114806

PMCPMC12937153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY-NC-ND

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.