Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41767259›Full record

ArticleiScience2026

Poset sensitivity analysis reveals post 2020 changes in human development index components.

Francesc Martori, Tadashi Hirai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Francesc MartoriIQS School of Management, Universitat Ramon Llull, Barcelona, Spain.
Tadashi HiraiIQS School of Management, Universitat Ramon Llull, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study assesses the sensitivity of the Human Development Index (HDI) using partially ordered set (poset) analysis. Unlike conventional methods, such as correlation, dominance, or simulation-based techniques, poset analysis maintains the multidimensional structure of the HDI and captures cases of incomparability, offering a more nuanced understanding of variable influence. Applying this method to HDI data from 1990 to 2023, the analysis shows that expected years of schooling have been the most sensitive variable historically. However, since 2020, life expectancy has gained prominence, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, with the greatest impact observed in very high HDI countries. This shift reveals how external shocks can alter the comparative structure of development rankings. By focusing on structural changes rather than marginal effects, poset-based sensitivity analysis provides valuable insights for refining HDI methodology and informing policy strategies. It offers a robust alternative for evaluating indicator influence without relying on arbitrary weighting assumptions.

Indexed as

Data analysisResearch methodology social sciencesSocial sciences

Identifiers

PMID41767259
PMCPMC12936846

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.