Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41767013›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology

Automatic classification and prognosis prediction of cerebral hemorrhage based on a deep learning model.

Ying Mao, Xiaoyu Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ying MaoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Brain Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Xiaoyu WangDepartment of Equipment, Affiliated Brain Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Cerebral hemorrhage presents a major clinical challenge due to its high mortality and complex pathological characteristics. To address the limitations of traditional diagnostic methods, this study proposes HemorrhageNet, a deep learning framework for automatic classification and prognosis prediction of cerebral hemorrhage. Methods: HemorrhageNet integrates multimodal data-including CT and MRI imaging, patient demographics, and clinical parameters-through a dual-path architecture comprising an imaging feature extractor and a clinical feature processor. A graphical propagation layer based on attention mechanisms enables the model to highlight critical hemorrhagic regions, while a multi-task optimization scheme jointly learns classification and prognosis objectives. This design ensures accurate, interpretable, and computationally efficient predictions across diverse patient populations. Building upon this architecture, an adaptive prognostic strategy for cerebral hemorrhage prediction is developed to enhance model generalization and clinical alignment. This strategy incorporates dynamic feature selection to identify the most informative patient-specific attributes, a hierarchical decision-making framework that refines predictions through multi-level reasoning, and uncertainty-aware optimization to quantify confidence and flag ambiguous cases for expert review. These components collectively strengthen interpretability, reduce bias from heterogeneous data, and improve reliability in real-world settings. Results and discussion: Extensive experiments on benchmark medical datasets demonstrate that the proposed framework surpasses existing state-of-the-art methods in accuracy, robustness, and transparency. The integration of HemorrhageNet with the adaptive prognostic strategy provides a comprehensive, explainable solution for cerebral hemorrhage management and prognosis assessment.

Indexed as

adaptive strategycerebral hemorrhagedeep learningHemorrhageNetmultimodal integrationprognosis prediction

Identifiers

PMID41767013
PMCPMC12937131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.