Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41766975›Full record

ReviewFood science and biotechnology2026

Research review of enzyme-responsive packaging in food preservation.

Chaoping Jiang, Yu Hao, Zichun Jin, Jialin Liu, Wenxiu Sun

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Food science and biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chaoping JiangRoom 407, College of Food Science and Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, No. 306 Zhaowuda Road, Saihan District, Hohhot, 010018 Inner Mongolia China.
Yu HaoRoom 407, College of Food Science and Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, No. 306 Zhaowuda Road, Saihan District, Hohhot, 010018 Inner Mongolia China.
Zichun JinRoom 407, College of Food Science and Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, No. 306 Zhaowuda Road, Saihan District, Hohhot, 010018 Inner Mongolia China.
Jialin LiuRoom 407, College of Food Science and Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, No. 306 Zhaowuda Road, Saihan District, Hohhot, 010018 Inner Mongolia China.
Wenxiu SunRoom 407, College of Food Science and Engineering, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, No. 306 Zhaowuda Road, Saihan District, Hohhot, 010018 Inner Mongolia China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food spoilage caused by microbial contamination not only poses significant risks to food safety but also hinders economic development. Therefore, it is imperative to study appropriate food packaging solutions to address this issue. Enzyme-responsive packaging has emerged as a prominent area of research due to its exceptional advantages, which include not only bacterial inhibition but also specificity, self-initiation, and safety-attributes that are not present in other types of responsive packaging. This paper begins by introducing the principles of enzyme-responsive packaging. Furthermore, the classification of enzyme-responsive packaging is examined, and methods for preparing are discussed. Additionally, this review summarizes advancements in the application of enzyme-responsive packaging for food preservation and proposes future research directions and focal points. In conclusion, this review aims to serve as a reference for the comprehensive research and development of enzyme-responsive packaging.

Indexed as

Active packagingAntimicrobialControlled releaseEnzyme responseFood preservation

Identifiers

PMID41766975
PMCPMC12946563

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.