ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Multi-objective optimization model for dynamic airspace allocation of urban drones in medical emergency delivery.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deployment, dispatch, and delivery: a scoping review of drone-delivered AED for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Reducing rural health inequity through drone-based delivery: a spatial multi-criteria decision framework prioritizing epidemiological vulnerability in hub location.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Urban emergency delivery systems face serious challenges in dealing with traffic congestion, structural limitations, and accessibility challenges that confront traditional ground-based emergency medical services. This study proposes a novel multi-objective optimization approach to the dynamic airspace allocation for unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) in urban emergency environments. Methods: The approach simultaneously optimizes four competing objectives including the decrease in delivery time, the costs, the increase in airspace usage efficiency, and the reduction in risks incurred by hazards to safety. An Improved NSGA-III (Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm III) algorithm with real-time adaptability characteristics and conflict resolution algorithms for emergency conditions was developed. The effectiveness was evaluated through in-depth Monte Carlo simulations that applied real urban emergency scenarios from the metropolitan area of Hangzhou, taking measurements from a metropolitan area of 150 km Results: Simulation results suggest considerable performance improvements, with a decrease in response time by 61% (from 18.5 to 7.2 min), as well as a decrease in delivery costs by 85% (from $280 to $42.3) when compared to calibrated ground-based emergency services baseline. The dynamic reallocation mechanism provided 85 to 96% reference performance in adverse conditions such as mass incidents, adverse weather, and equipment failures, with adaptation cycles achieved in average time of 1.8 ± 0.3 s. Sensitivity analyses revealed that the size of the UAV fleet emerged as the primary performance-influencing factor. Discussion: This simulation-based framework provides a foundation for future emergency response system improvements, with pilot trials and hardware-in-the-loop testing representing essential next steps for practical deployment. The findings have considerable policy implications for urban air mobility planning and resource allocation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.