ArticleFrontiers in immunology2026
Association between peripheral IFN-γ
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)-based immune checkpoint therapy (ICT), either alone or in combination with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) or bevacizumab, benefits a subset of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and reliable predictive biomarkers remain limited. Methods: Between August 2024 and July 2025, 55 HCC patients treated with PD-1-based therapies were included. Objective response rate (ORR) was assessed according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). Peripheral cytotoxic lymphocyte subsets and effector functions were profiled by multiparameter flow cytometry. Results: We observed that the ICT plus TKI group exhibited a higher ORR than ICT monotherapy (54.5% vs. 29.4%; n = 22 vs. n = 17), whereas the ORR in the ICT plus bevacizumab group was comparable to ICT monotherapy (37.5% vs. 29.4%; n = 16 vs. n = 17). Compared with ICT monotherapy, patients receiving ICT plus TKI therapy had higher peripheral CD8 Conclusion: These findings support peripheral IFN-γ
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.