ReviewJournal of otology2026
Prognostic Scoring Systems in Ossiculoplasty: A Comprehensive Review and Introduction of a Novel Predictive Index.
Review in Journal of otology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ossiculoplasty remains a challenging surgical procedure, with outcomes heavily influenced by diverse anatomical and pathological factors. Over the decades, numerous scoring systems have been developed to predict the prognosis of ossiculoplasty, each emphasizing different variables such as ossicular status, middle ear environment, and surgical history. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the evolution of prognostic scoring systems, including Austin's original ossicular classification, Bellucci's otorrhea staging, the Middle Ear Risk Index (MERI), the Ossiculoplasty Outcome Parameter Staging (OOPS), and the recently introduced Ear Environment Risk (EER) scale. While these systems have significantly contributed to preoperative assessment, each presents notable limitations in encompassing all variables affecting surgical success. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to provide a review of the ossiculoplasty prognostic scores and show the benefits, innovations and gaps associated with each. To address these gaps, a novel, modified scoring system is proposed, incorporating previously overlooked but clinically significant factors such as tympanic membrane status, type of tympanoplasty, ossicular replacement material, CT scan findings, and the presence of complicated ear conditions. By synthesizing elements from historical scores with updated clinical insights, the proposed system aims to provide a more holistic and predictive framework for preoperative evaluation. Future multicenter studies are encouraged to validate the efficacy and prognostic power of this new scoring system, with the goal of improving surgical planning and patient counseling in ossiculoplasty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.