ArticleJournal of otology2026
Above, Below, and Beyond: Distinct Vertical‑Plane Localization Profiles in Normal Hearing Listeners.
Article in Journal of otology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesThe perception of sound in the vertical plane supports spatial hearing by enabling listeners to detect sources located above and below. Sounds originating from both the front and back elevations along the mid-sagittal plane further contribute to a three-dimensional auditory experience. This study aimed to characterize the variability in vertical sound localization abilities among normal-hearing (NH) individuals using spatialized audio. MATERIALS AND
methodsFifty-one NH participants (aged 18 to 35 years) completed three vertical localization tasks under headphones as part of a single-group, within-subject experimental study. These tasks included two-plane identification: (1) top-down localization, (2) front-back localization, and one discrimination task in the front plane. Hierarchical Cluster Analysis (HCA) was employed to identify distinct patterns in spatial localization profiles specific to the vertical-median plane. Fisher's Discriminant Function Analysis (FDA) was used to validate the accuracy of HCA and estimate classification error.
resultsHCA revealed three distinct listener clusters: (1) cluster 1 with good performance across all three tasks, (2) cluster 2 with selective impairment in top-bottom identification, and (3) cluster 3 with selective deficits in front-back identification. FDA validated group membership of the clusters identified by the HCA, with a prediction accuracy of 98%.
conclusionsIndividuals with clinically NH exhibited three distinct vertical localization profiles: uniform performers, those impaired in top-bottom identification, and those impaired in front-back identification. These profiles may be linked to the interplay between acoustic and non-acoustic perceptual factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.