Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41766831›Full record

ReviewJNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association2025

Morphological Variations of Coronoid Process in Dry Adult Human Mandibles: A Narrartive Review.

Santosh Kumar Nirala, Lei Yuan, Syed Mushraf

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Santosh Kumar NiralaDepartment of Human Anatomy, Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities Baise, Youjiang District, Guangxi Province, China.
Lei YuanDepartment of Medicine, Chinese Medical Center Baden, Baden, Wurttemberg, Germany.
Syed MushrafDepartment of Basic Medical Sciences, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The coronoid process of the mandible is a significant anatomical structure integral to mastication and mandibular stability. It serves as an attachment site for the masseter and temporalis muscles, crucial for jaw movement and function. Beyond its functional roles, it holds therapeutic value in reconstructive craniomaxillofacial surgeries, where it serves as a versatile graft material for addressing osseous defects such as fractures, alveolar defects, and sinus augmentations. Anatomically, it exhibits diverse morphological variations, including triangular, hook-shaped, and rounded forms. These variations not only contribute to understanding anatomical differences but also serve as anthropological markers for ethnic characteristics and ancestry in forensic contexts. Radiographic techniques such as orthopantomograms facilitate the identification and analysis of these morphological differences, essential for both clinical assessments and forensic identifications. Gender-specific differences in its morphology highlight the influence of genetic, hormonal, and developmental factors on mandibular structure. In conclusion, the coronoid process exemplifies a multifaceted anatomical structure with implications spanning clinical practice, anthropological research, and forensic sciences. Understanding its diverse roles and morphological variations enhances surgical outcomes, aids in anthropological studies, and contributes to forensic identifications, emphasizing its enduring relevance in both medical and scientific disciplines.

Indexed as

Anatomic VariationMandibleAdultHumansRadiography, Panoramiccoronoid processmandiblemorphological variations

Identifiers

PMID41766831
PMCPMC12831823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.