Trial reportJNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association2025
Reinforcement of Peer-Coaching and Clinical Audit to Improve Implementation of Package for Essential Non-Communicable Diseases (PEN) in Nepal: A Pilot Implementation Study Method.
Trial report in JNMA; journal of the Nepal Medical Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05880784 (Peer Coaching and Clinical Audit to Facilitate Implementation of the Package of Essential Non-Communicable Diseases), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Peer Coaching and Clinical Audit to Facilitate Implementation of the Package of Essential Non-Communicable Diseases (PEN) in Nepal: a Mixed Method Implementation Study
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Nepal endorsed and implemented the WHO Package of Essential Non-communicable Disease Intervention. However, its implementation is far from satisfactory. We designed and implemented an intervention to reinforce peer coaching and clinical audit mechanisms in primary-level health facilities, and tested its feasibility and preliminary effectiveness. This paper details the methodology used in designing, implementing and assessing the intervention. Methods: The study adoptes a hybrid type II implementation trial design. The intervention assignment followed a non-blinded, two-arm, parallel randomized controlled trial design with a 1:1 allocation ratio. Seventeen primary-level public health facilities in Bhaktapur district with at least one trained staff were randomized. The clinical staff at the intervention health facilities received peer-coaching and clinical audit reinforcement, while the control group followed their usual practice. The study was conducted over a 12-month duration from Februay 2022, to January, 2023. A mixed-method approach, applying pre-post assessment and thematic analysis, to inform the intervention development and assess implementation outcomes and its effectiveness was adopted. The study was guided by the Proctor framework. Ethical clearance was obtained from the Nepal Health Research Council (Registraion number: 302/2021). Discussion: The tools and methods that guide intervention implementation and assessment have the potential to be replicated in various settings to design strategies to improve Package of Essential Non-communicable Disease Intervention adoption and sustainment. Trial Registration: This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov), Identifier: NCT05880784.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.