ArticleFrontiers in health services2026
Patient health literacy and cognitive impairment surveys highlight barriers to patient-provider communication.
Article in Frontiers in health services, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Communication Barriers in Patient-Provider Interactions in Health Care: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Providers may underestimate patient health literacy, and patients may not understand commonly used medical terms. Undiagnosed cognitive impairment among Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery (URPS) patients may further hinder communication. We assessed communication barriers between URPS clinic patients and their providers. Methods: Following IRB approval, women aged 18-80 years attending outpatient visits were invited to participate. Non-English speakers and those with diagnosed cognitive impairment were excluded. Participants completed a health literacy measure (REALM-SF), a validated cognitive impairment screen (STMS questionnaire), and an 8th-grade level URPS Lexicon of ten medical terms. Providers, blinded to questionnaire results, then answered questions about their perception of the patient's health literacy and cognitive status. Results: From June to December 2024, 157 patients were invited to participate (9 declined). Of the 59 who scored in at least the mild impairment range (29-33) on the STMS, only 2 were noted by the provider as cognitively impaired. All words were correctly identified by 100 patients (68%), and at least 8 words by 82%. "Vagina" was the most commonly misdefined, followed by "bowel," "pelvis," and "urethra." Providers identified 7 patients as having low health literacy, 4 of whom answered 6 or fewer words correctly, while 3 answered all 10 words correctly. Patients with lower health literacy had significantly lower STMS scores as compared to the patients with high-school level health literacy ( Conclusions: Discrepancies between provider assessments and screening results highlight the need for improved recognition of cognitive impairment and health literacy to enhance communication and patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.