ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Detection of human papillomavirus (HPV)-specific T cell response in women with low-grade cervical intraepithelial lesion and HPV vaccinated subjects.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted infection worldwide and HPV-driven cervical cancers remain a major health concern. This study aimed primarily to develop a test for assessing and characterizing HPV-specific T-cell responses, in HPV-vaccinated women and women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)1. Methods: T-cell responses against HPV-16 and 18 L1, E6, and E7 proteins were evaluated by flow cytometry with a 24h activation-induced marker (AIM) and a 7-day lymphoproliferation (LPR) assays in 18 vaccinated and 60 CIN1 women. HPV genotyping was performed on vaginal swab samples. Results: LPR assay demonstrated higher sensitivity than AIM. T-cell response was mainly directed against L1 and was higher in CD4+ than CD8+ T cells. All vaccinated women exhibited CD4+ T-cell responses against HPV-16 and to a lesser extent HPV-18 L1. Among CIN1 patients, 46.6% and 33.3% showed HPV-16 and -18 L1-specific CD4+ responses, respectively, even when infected with other HPV strains. Responses were predominantly associated with TH1 and TH17 phenotypes. Conclusions: The LPR assay is a sensitive tool for detecting HPV-specific T-cell responses. The presence of T-cell responses in CIN1 patients infected with non-16/18 HPVs suggests potential cross-reactivity among HPV genotypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.