ArticleOccupational therapy international2026
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Persian Version of the ADL Taxonomy Questionnaire in Persons With Stroke: A Rasch Analysis.
Article in Occupational therapy international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Evaluation of the Persian Version of the ADL Taxonomy Questionnaire in Persons With Stroke: A Rasch Analysis.Occupational therapy international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cultural adaptation of assessment tools is essential to ensure their accuracy and relevance across different populations. Objectives: The study focused on cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Persian ADL Taxonomy for assessing daily activities in persons with stroke. Data Collection Location: Data were collected in a clinical setting and a university hospital in Tehran. Methods: The ADL Taxonomy was translated into Persian in accordance with standard guidelines. Face validity was tested with 20 stroke patients and convergent validity with 104. Validity and test-retest reliability were analyzed using SPSS, Spearman correlation with MBI scores, and Pearson correlation for reliability( Results: Face validity confirmed item clarity, with minor edits. Impact scores ranged from 2.70 to 5.00. Content validity indices were high (CVR = 0.54-1.0; Conclusions: The Persian version of the ADL Taxonomy demonstrated excellent validity and reliability, with most items showing good fit and discrimination. The scale reliably distinguished between five levels of ability, and no ceiling or floor effects were observed in the Rasch analysis, supporting its use for assessing daily activities in Persian-speaking stroke patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.