ArticleFrontiers in surgery2025
Nasal dorsal augmentation using diced cartilage with and without semi-circumferential fascia: technical note and retrospective monocentric study.
Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Nasal dorsal augmentation is a fundamental step of rhinoplasty. It must provide height, projection, but also respect the aesthetic lines. Grafts made with diced-cartilage are moldable and have the capability to adequately adapt to the patient's anatomy. Many techniques have been described, with or without fascia wrapping. Objective: We describe two variations of the dorsal augmentation technique, using glued diced cartilage with and without semi-circumferential fascia. The cartilage is chopped, placed in a hemi syringe and covered with glue-tissue. A layer of fascia or perichondrium may be used to smooth the graft. It is still malleable and can be finely adjusted to the nose. We illustrate the technique and present the postoperative results; we used questionnaires to measure patients' and surgeons' satisfaction. Results: We included thirty-three patients, who underwent rhinoplasty with dorsal augmentation between September 2013 and January 2020. Nineteen were reconstructed with fascia, while fourteen, without. We chose the fascia technique mainly for women. There appeared to be greater satisfaction within the group with fascia, but not significant. Patients tended to be more satisfied if it was a first surgery rather than a revision, and if the origin of the deformity was anatomical, rather than post-traumatic or postoperative; women seemed more satisfied than men. There was no correlation between surgeons' and patients' satisfaction. Conclusion: The choice of surgical technique is made on a case-by-case basis, adapting to the patient's anatomy. We describe two techniques that are relatively simple, easily applicable and at the same time, provide regular and smooth grafts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.